Simulacra and sub-simulation of post-modern reality

Baudrillard did influence some of my thought patterns, nevertheless as one would put it it is becoming difficult to remember you are observing reality from within it and any objective thought will never really be objective. so it is the subjectivity of an hermeneutical ground that really sets in… anyhow, as impressed as one could pretend to be it is the passion and emotion of the 5 senses that off the 99% reality of the remaining unobservable universe.

Here is a taste of university of southern california students productions on this topic:

The discourse on time and space

Yes, no news is good news. The large hadron collider is not producing anything much if not the excitement of porn scientists which I do apreciate as they come down from the anti-experiential lineage, or at least they had no choice than do so.

So time and space remain in the realm of flexible extensions of human thought where two diffent places and two different time cause no wander when they coexist in the same space and time.

well, that’s what my grandfather, now almost 95yrs old, said one day in front of the TV: ‘e c’sfaccimm, cu nu piret ‘a gent s’indegn e i ca putess scassà nu neutrin a capat, c’avessa dicere?’

He is right, as all ancient wisdom puts it: if things are because they exist in tangible terms, then there is not even a present if it is a transition between two non existing states: past and future. Either non of them exists, or all three co-exist. Oh yeah, I think this is more like it.

De-location and relocation of coinciding space. Theme for a future post.

IN MEMORY OF RICHARD WRIGHT